Where would we start, though? I’m not sure I know enough to write about research that applies specifically to nursing. Maybe medlibs could write guides to effective use of PubMed, OVID, and/or other search tools?
I have a really good list of nursing RSS feeds from my friend Frankie at Medworm.com. Do you think that would be an appropriate contribution, or too geeky to be helpful?
3
Amanda:
July 13th, 2006 at 2:09 pm
Yes, that’s the thing I have to get over when it comes to wikis. I always think there must be someone out there, somewhere who knows more on this topic than I do. (I suppose that is very librarian-ish of me: “I am not the expert, but I can find out who is.”) But of course, that is also the beauty of wikis, we can start something small and someone else will finish it.
I think we could come up with a short list of terms for a few of us med/hospital librarians to contribute to. And I certainly don’t think nursing RSS feeds would be too geeky a topic, as those using wikis are more likely to be slightly tech-savvy/geeky anyway!
Articles récents. Double sens · Bayes, toujours d'actualité. Bring 'Em Back Alive · Two Japanese Wrestlers by a Sink. Cytochromes et clopidogrel (2). Commentaires récents. doudou dans Bayes, toujours d'actualité. ... […]
that looks at the stereotypes of how people view the young, and what the reality is, when it comes to the publishing industry and books. It was produced by the UK branch of Dorling Kindersley Books for a sales conference, ... […]
I've been trying to wait until bloglines* can get itself together and work properly again to post this, but I have other stuff I am dying to show you already! The final two heart to heart swappers very generously sent along an extra ... […]
David Rothman has an informative post about adding medical terms to your spell checker in Word. Rather than adding medical terms individually, you can populate your spell checker with thousands of medical terms from one file, ... […]
Following my posting on best practices, David Rothman, Community's blogging librarian, chided me this week with a copy of "Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of ... […]
July 13th, 2006 at 1:04 pm
I hope all us librarians will add some library and information terms as well!
July 13th, 2006 at 1:13 pm
Hi Amanda! Thanks for leaving a comment!
I absolutely share your hope.
Maybe the Nursing Research section would be a good place for medical librarians to contribute?
http://en.nursingwiki.org/index.php?title=Nursing_research&action=edit
Where would we start, though? I’m not sure I know enough to write about research that applies specifically to nursing. Maybe medlibs could write guides to effective use of PubMed, OVID, and/or other search tools?
I have a really good list of nursing RSS feeds from my friend Frankie at Medworm.com. Do you think that would be an appropriate contribution, or too geeky to be helpful?
July 13th, 2006 at 2:09 pm
Yes, that’s the thing I have to get over when it comes to wikis. I always think there must be someone out there, somewhere who knows more on this topic than I do. (I suppose that is very librarian-ish of me: “I am not the expert, but I can find out who is.”) But of course, that is also the beauty of wikis, we can start something small and someone else will finish it.
So here is my initial (one sentence) contribution: http://en.nursingwiki.org/wiki/Evidence-based_nursing
I think we could come up with a short list of terms for a few of us med/hospital librarians to contribute to. And I certainly don’t think nursing RSS feeds would be too geeky a topic, as those using wikis are more likely to be slightly tech-savvy/geeky anyway!
March 2nd, 2007 at 8:20 am
[...] Nursing Wiki [...]