<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Librarians &#8217;should be sexier&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/</link>
	<description>Health Information &#124; Geekery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:43:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arriving Somewhere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Job Titles</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/comment-page-1/#comment-50705</link>
		<dc:creator>Arriving Somewhere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Job Titles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/#comment-50705</guid>
		<description>[...] hat tip: http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hat tip: <a href="http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/" rel="nofollow">http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Gallaway</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/comment-page-1/#comment-41091</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Gallaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/#comment-41091</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m partial to informationgoddess ;) have been for 3 years, since a patron called me that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m partial to informationgoddess <img src='http://davidrothman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  have been for 3 years, since a patron called me that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/comment-page-1/#comment-6125</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/#comment-6125</guid>
		<description>Bibliotecario is pretty or Information Tamer (wha-crack!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bibliotecario is pretty or Information Tamer (wha-crack!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/comment-page-1/#comment-5490</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 11:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/#comment-5490</guid>
		<description>Okay!  The poll is posted here:
http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/18/poll-what-title-should-replace-librarian/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay!  The poll is posted here:<br />
<a href="http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/18/poll-what-title-should-replace-librarian/" rel="nofollow">http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/18/poll-what-title-should-replace-librarian/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lo-fi</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/comment-page-1/#comment-5435</link>
		<dc:creator>lo-fi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 21:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/#comment-5435</guid>
		<description>BookWench (one for the ladies)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BookWench (one for the ladies)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/comment-page-1/#comment-5406</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/#comment-5406</guid>
		<description>&quot;Knowledge Hacker&quot; might be a good one.  As for librarians needing to be sexier, maybe my new Lip Service goth gear and Utilikilt will help with that. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Knowledge Hacker&#8221; might be a good one.  As for librarians needing to be sexier, maybe my new Lip Service goth gear and Utilikilt will help with that. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eiseldora</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/comment-page-1/#comment-5404</link>
		<dc:creator>Eiseldora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/#comment-5404</guid>
		<description>Information Goddess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Information Goddess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobi</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/comment-page-1/#comment-5391</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/#comment-5391</guid>
		<description>How about &quot;Faithful of Wiborada&quot; (the librarian) and &quot;Circle of Wiborada&quot; (librarians)? Wiborada (http://www.catholic-forum.com/saintS/saintw27.htm) is the patron saint of the librarians. Ok, this isn&#039;t really modern too, but would apppeal to catholics and fantasy fans :D

For the science fiction fan we could adapt to &quot;Chosen of the Information Matrix&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about &#8220;Faithful of Wiborada&#8221; (the librarian) and &#8220;Circle of Wiborada&#8221; (librarians)? Wiborada (<a href="http://www.catholic-forum.com/saintS/saintw27.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.catholic-forum.com/saintS/saintw27.htm</a>) is the patron saint of the librarians. Ok, this isn&#8217;t really modern too, but would apppeal to catholics and fantasy fans <img src='http://davidrothman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>For the science fiction fan we could adapt to &#8220;Chosen of the Information Matrix&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Potter</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/comment-page-1/#comment-5376</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2006/11/16/librarians-should-be-sexier/#comment-5376</guid>
		<description>I would definately go for &quot;Information Alchemist&quot;.  As for the article, I always find myself shaking my head when I hear that libraries need to be more &quot;sexy&quot;.  After all, we&#039;re information professionals, not the Rockettes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definately go for &#8220;Information Alchemist&#8221;.  As for the article, I always find myself shaking my head when I hear that libraries need to be more &#8220;sexy&#8221;.  After all, we&#8217;re information professionals, not the Rockettes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
