LibWorm makes “Top 10″ for 2007 list at LISNews (Edited)
on
LISNews has made a list of “10 Blogs To Read in 2007″ with LibWorm coming in at #4!
4. LibWorm
If you were familiar with LISFeeds, then consider Libworm to be LISFeeds 2.0. It doesn’t (yet) have all the features I wrote for LISFeeds, but I think you’ll find it a great way to follow all the blogs you can possibly handle. It’s nice to have a tool that specializes in aggregating the biblioblogosphere, and I’m looking forward to seeing what LibWorm adds this year.
Although LibWorm isn’t itself a blog, we’re thrilled to mentioned in this way- thanks!
Questions for Blake, though:
Which features from LISFeeds do you most want to see implemented first, and why haven’t you emailed us or left a note in the form at LibWorm to suggest them?
EDIT: Frankie rightly points out in the comments that Blake has already offered us feedback. I just want more ’cause I’m greedy.
We’re really counting on users to let us know what enhancements they most want to see, so I hope that Blake won’t be the only one sharing his thoughts! Use the form at LibWorm (bottom of the page) or email me at david [AT] libworm [DOT] com.
Like this post? Subscribe to the RSS feed!
January 25th, 2007 at 12:27 pm
Congratulations!
And may I just say, for anyone who has ideas for improving the site, David and Frankie are AMAZING at responding to questions and suggestions.
January 25th, 2007 at 1:26 pm
Congrats David, well deserved.
January 25th, 2007 at 1:38 pm
Just a little note David to remind you that Blake did kindly provide us some suggestions when LibWorm went live: advanced search, browse by feed, newest posts and newly updated feeds – none of which have been forgotten and will be incorporated soon
Of course, any further suggestions on what else could be done to improve LibWorm functionality, from Blake or anyone else, I would love to hear.
January 25th, 2007 at 4:04 pm
Absolutely true, Frankie. I’m just greedy for Blake’s ideas.