http://davidrothman.net/2007/02/27/first-pubdrug-monographs-available/ Health Information | Geekery Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:42:02 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://davidrothman.net/2007/02/27/first-pubdrug-monographs-available/comment-page-1/#comment-36829 woodyevans.com » wiki surgery update Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:35:02 +0000 http://davidrothman.net/2007/02/27/first-pubdrug-monographs-available/#comment-36829 [...] Following on from the link to the encyclopedia of surgical techniques that anyone can edit (jeeeeezus), David Rothman says to me: …You may want to take a look at these posts about medical Wikis: Nature Medicine on Wikis (edited) First PubDrug Monographs Available PubDrug updates OVER!MY!MED!BODY! on Medical Wikis Lots More Medical Wikis [...] [...] Following on from the link to the encyclopedia of surgical techniques that anyone can edit (jeeeeezus), David Rothman says to me: …You may want to take a look at these posts about medical Wikis: Nature Medicine on Wikis (edited) First PubDrug Monographs Available PubDrug updates OVER!MY!MED!BODY! on Medical Wikis Lots More Medical Wikis [...]

]]> http://davidrothman.net/2007/02/27/first-pubdrug-monographs-available/comment-page-1/#comment-33990 davidrothman.net » Blog Archive » Nature Medicine on Wikis Fri, 02 Mar 2007 07:21:56 +0000 http://davidrothman.net/2007/02/27/first-pubdrug-monographs-available/#comment-33990 [...] First PubDrug Monographs Available [...] [...] First PubDrug Monographs Available [...]

]]> http://davidrothman.net/2007/02/27/first-pubdrug-monographs-available/comment-page-1/#comment-33417 David Rothman Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:45:40 +0000 http://davidrothman.net/2007/02/27/first-pubdrug-monographs-available/#comment-33417 Looking forward to hearing more, Stew! Looking forward to hearing more, Stew!

]]> http://davidrothman.net/2007/02/27/first-pubdrug-monographs-available/comment-page-1/#comment-33396 Stew Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:06:14 +0000 http://davidrothman.net/2007/02/27/first-pubdrug-monographs-available/#comment-33396 Thanks for the post, David. We're pretty excited about how things are moving forward. We still need to work out a lot of details about the editorial process, prove the model and then expand it to include other pharmacy schools (2008?), but nothing that's insurmountable. I'll try to keep you apprised. Thanks for the post, David. We’re pretty excited about how things are moving forward. We still need to work out a lot of details about the editorial process, prove the model and then expand it to include other pharmacy schools (2008?), but nothing that’s insurmountable. I’ll try to keep you apprised.

]]>