<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kosmix&#8217;s RightHealth.com vs. the Dyson Vacuum Cleaner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/</link>
	<description>Exploring Medical Librarianship and Web Geekery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:40:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/comment-page-1/#comment-110467</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/#comment-110467</guid>
		<description>Hi Saumil-

Very glad to hear that you&#039;re reducing the number of advertisements.  It would also be helpful to visually make clear separations between content and advertisements so that users can&#039;t confuse the two.

The algorithmic construction of pages is NOT an excuse for including information from terrible sources.  In order to be a responsible provide of healthcare information you MUST make at least SOME editorial judgments.  These would include making smart choices about what sites the algorithm will allow to be included in search results.  

For instance, sites that are only selling a product should not be included.  Sites that are selling snake oil (e.g. homeopathy) should not be included.  The algorithm should sort the results to place the most reliable and authoritative consumer healthcare information (coming from the NIH, Web MD, The Mayo Clinic, etc.) at the very top of the results.

A young friend of mine was recently diagnosed with Ulcerative Colitis.  I found myself frustrated and angry at the thought of how difficult she would find it to get useful, reliable information from this RightHealth search.  Saumil, I worry that the people building vertical health information search tools fail to realize that health information &lt;em&gt;is not like other kinds of information&lt;/em&gt; and cannot be treated the same way.

Again, I LOVE Kosmix&#039;s faceted browsing and think it has wonderful potential.  I&#039;d enjoy seeing previews of new features.

However, the page you link to is still topped with advertisements, then Wikipedia, then homeopathy.  I won&#039;t be recommending RightHealth to anyone while these problems exist.

Best,

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Saumil-</p>
<p>Very glad to hear that you&#8217;re reducing the number of advertisements.  It would also be helpful to visually make clear separations between content and advertisements so that users can&#8217;t confuse the two.</p>
<p>The algorithmic construction of pages is NOT an excuse for including information from terrible sources.  In order to be a responsible provide of healthcare information you MUST make at least SOME editorial judgments.  These would include making smart choices about what sites the algorithm will allow to be included in search results.  </p>
<p>For instance, sites that are only selling a product should not be included.  Sites that are selling snake oil (e.g. homeopathy) should not be included.  The algorithm should sort the results to place the most reliable and authoritative consumer healthcare information (coming from the NIH, Web MD, The Mayo Clinic, etc.) at the very top of the results.</p>
<p>A young friend of mine was recently diagnosed with Ulcerative Colitis.  I found myself frustrated and angry at the thought of how difficult she would find it to get useful, reliable information from this RightHealth search.  Saumil, I worry that the people building vertical health information search tools fail to realize that health information <em>is not like other kinds of information</em> and cannot be treated the same way.</p>
<p>Again, I LOVE Kosmix&#8217;s faceted browsing and think it has wonderful potential.  I&#8217;d enjoy seeing previews of new features.</p>
<p>However, the page you link to is still topped with advertisements, then Wikipedia, then homeopathy.  I won&#8217;t be recommending RightHealth to anyone while these problems exist.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saumil Mehta</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/comment-page-1/#comment-110068</link>
		<dc:creator>Saumil Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/#comment-110068</guid>
		<description>David,

Thank you for your detailed feedback on RightHealth&#039;s user experience. My name is Saumil Mehta; I&#039;m a product manager at Kosmix RightHealth. We do agree with you regarding many of the points you make. We try out different UI treatments from time to time, and some ideas don&#039;t work as well as others. We try to be proactive and learn quickly from our mistakes. For example, please visit http://www.righthealth.com/Health/ulcerative_colitis/m-1-s? and you&#039;ll see the number of ads on top cut down to two, ensuring that more algorithmic content appears above the fold.
 
That leads us to the second point. At Kosmix all our pages are created algorithmically, by scanning through millions of web pages, images, and other content. We do not make editorial judgements to promote or favor certain results over others. Algorithms are not perfect, and can sometimes make mistakes; we are continually tuning ours and you should expect to see the problematic result you mentioned go away. The advantage of being algorithmic is that we can provide relevant results even for obscure topics.
 
We are working on several additional features and improvements that we believe will enhance the value of our service. Perhaps we could schedule a time to give you a sneak preview of what&#039;s coming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Thank you for your detailed feedback on RightHealth&#8217;s user experience. My name is Saumil Mehta; I&#8217;m a product manager at Kosmix RightHealth. We do agree with you regarding many of the points you make. We try out different UI treatments from time to time, and some ideas don&#8217;t work as well as others. We try to be proactive and learn quickly from our mistakes. For example, please visit <a href="http://www.righthealth.com/Health/ulcerative_colitis/m-1-s?" rel="nofollow">http://www.righthealth.com/Health/ulcerative_colitis/m-1-s?</a> and you&#8217;ll see the number of ads on top cut down to two, ensuring that more algorithmic content appears above the fold.</p>
<p>That leads us to the second point. At Kosmix all our pages are created algorithmically, by scanning through millions of web pages, images, and other content. We do not make editorial judgements to promote or favor certain results over others. Algorithms are not perfect, and can sometimes make mistakes; we are continually tuning ours and you should expect to see the problematic result you mentioned go away. The advantage of being algorithmic is that we can provide relevant results even for obscure topics.</p>
<p>We are working on several additional features and improvements that we believe will enhance the value of our service. Perhaps we could schedule a time to give you a sneak preview of what&#8217;s coming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/comment-page-1/#comment-109559</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/#comment-109559</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Pat! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Pat! <img src='http://davidrothman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Washburn, OrganizedWisdom.com</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/comment-page-1/#comment-109549</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Washburn, OrganizedWisdom.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 20:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/#comment-109549</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post! I&#039;ve included it (along with two others of yours -- wow!) in &lt;a href=&quot;http://wisdom.blogs.com/health/2007/08/medicine-20-blo.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Medicine 2.0 Blog Carnival&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href=&quot;http://wisdom.blogs.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Health Wisdom Blog&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post! I&#8217;ve included it (along with two others of yours &#8212; wow!) in <a href="http://wisdom.blogs.com/health/2007/08/medicine-20-blo.html" rel="nofollow">The Medicine 2.0 Blog Carnival</a> at <a href="http://wisdom.blogs.com" rel="nofollow">The Health Wisdom Blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Fricker</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/comment-page-1/#comment-107590</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Fricker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/#comment-107590</guid>
		<description>Woo hoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woo hoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/comment-page-1/#comment-106682</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/#comment-106682</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s one genuine no-prize for Mr. Fricker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s one genuine no-prize for Mr. Fricker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Fricker</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/comment-page-1/#comment-106619</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Fricker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2007/08/02/kosmixs-righthealthcom-vs-the-dyson-vacuum-cleaner/#comment-106619</guid>
		<description>Something to do with how much they suck?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something to do with how much they suck?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
