Comments on: NEJM’s “Perspective Forum” http://davidrothman.net/2007/09/27/nejms-perspective-forum/ Health Information | Geekery Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:49:12 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Martin http://davidrothman.net/2007/09/27/nejms-perspective-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-119853 Martin Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:02:05 +0000 http://davidrothman.net/2007/09/27/nejms-perspective-forum/#comment-119853 Well, for a Publisher 1.0, NEJM has already done a lot - let's see if they dare to be a Publisher 2.0 (and we don't want NEJM to absorb the medical forums and blogs scene) Well, for a Publisher 1.0, NEJM has already done a lot – let’s see if they dare to be a Publisher 2.0
(and we don’t want NEJM to absorb the medical forums and blogs scene)

]]> By: A'Llyn Ettien http://davidrothman.net/2007/09/27/nejms-perspective-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-119844 A'Llyn Ettien Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:56:12 +0000 http://davidrothman.net/2007/09/27/nejms-perspective-forum/#comment-119844 I have nothing substantive to add to this, except that "Resounding Meh" strikes me as a great term and I think it should be broadly adopted. I can see whole categories usefully tagged with it! A rock band! A user-reaction study! Newspaper headlines! All right, getting crazy. But it made me smile. I have nothing substantive to add to this, except that “Resounding Meh” strikes me as a great term and I think it should be broadly adopted. I can see whole categories usefully tagged with it! A rock band! A user-reaction study! Newspaper headlines!

All right, getting crazy. But it made me smile.

]]>