6 “Best” Web 2.0 Health Tools
Fathom, a search engine marketing firm, pitches its expertise in healthcare marketing by producing a free report titled Check Yourself: The 6 Best Free Web 2.0 Healthcare Tools.
[PDF]
Short review of this report: Meh.
Like this post? Subscribe to the RSS feed!2 Responses to “6 “Best” Web 2.0 Health Tools”
Pages
- About
- Consumer Health and Patient Education Information Search Engine
- History of Medicine Search Engine
- List of Medical Wikis
- Medical Library Search Engine
Get our Book!
Advertisement
Recent Comments
- Nikki on NCBI ROFL
- Martha on NCBI ROFL
- Francesca Frati on CHLA-ABSC 2009
- Hope Leman on Q&A With Melissa Rethlefsen
- Michele M on EBSCOhost and ScienceDirect Blocking RSS re-syndication?
- Judson Dunham on EBSCOhost and ScienceDirect Blocking RSS re-syndication?
- B.A. on EBSCOhost and ScienceDirect Blocking RSS re-syndication?
- Creaky on EBSCOhost and ScienceDirect Blocking RSS re-syndication?
- Rudy on Watching Swine Flu on the Web
- Swine Flu | JoshKaner.com on Watching Swine Flu on the Web
Archives
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
Subscribe
Search
Contact
Elsewhere Online
Reciprocal Blogroll
- Atención Primaria
- Bakker’s Blog
- Belaray Dermatology
- Bibaholic
- BibMed Blog
- Biomedbiblog
- Biomedicine on Display
- Bloc de Bellvitge
- Bloc de Farmàcia
- CEP Library
- Circ and Serve
- Clinical Evidence, Searching Tidbits, and Other Minutiae
- Diabetes Mine
- DigiCMB
- Documentación, biblioteconomía e información
- Documentacion Granada
- EBM & HSR Resources on the ‘Net
- EBM and Clinical Support Librarians@UCHC
- Frankie Speaking Frankly
- Healia Health Blog
- Health LIS 2.0
- HIPPOCRATech
- HLA Blogs!
- Holly Witteman
- Hypothia
- I’m Feeling Lucky
- iBLOGthere4iM
- ICTconsequences
- Infomaniacs @ SGUL
- Journalology
- KnowBodies
- Laika’s MedLibLog
- Learn to Live
- Liberating the Literature
- Librarians’ Rx
- Lori Gawdyda’s Medical Librarian blog
- MHSLA Blog
- Musings of a Medical Librarian Maven
- OMG Tuna is Kewl
- On The Wards
- Only Connect!
- Patient Education Matters
- Primum non nocere
- Radswiki Blog
- Reference Musings
- Science Roll
- The Krafty Librarian
- The Ozmosis Blog
- Web 2.Oh. . .really?
- What Interests Me
- Women’s Health News
- Wouter on the Web
- Zoi-Sci
November 1st, 2007 at 4:29 pm
David,
First off, let me say that I like your blog–I think it does a lot for healthcare as well as information literacy. Secondly, I’d like to thank you for the link to the health guide page and the pdf itself. I’m honored that it caught your attention and you felt compelled enough to reference it.
But now I’m taking the bait. Your dramatically short review of my guide begs for an explanation. I understand the hip factor of being able to use the word “meh,” and of letting a feeling of indifference speak for itself. After all, sometimes indifference can’t be expressed by anything other than a shrug. But I’m curious as to why a person well-versed enough to blog about medical librarianship won’t offer a reasoned critique. You put your review in bold out there for all to see … care to elaborate?
Best Regards,
Paul Richlovsky
November 1st, 2007 at 6:18 pm
Hi Paul-
If you think I’m going for “hip,” I suspect you don’t actually read my blog. I don’t think that anyone who knows me at all would accuse me of being hip…or even attempting hipness. I’m sort of a great big dork.
I thought the report needed to be mentioned because it is on a topic of interest to many of this blog’s readers.
I had little to say about it because it is an opinion piece …and my opinions differ. A thorough fisking your report would probably not be of any interest to people who read my blog and wouldn’t be any fun for me to write.
So I stand by my “meh.”
Best,
-David