<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nitpicks: CNN&#8217;s &#8220;Tips for savvy medical Web surfing&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/21/nitpicks-cnns-tips-for-savvy-medical-web-surfing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/21/nitpicks-cnns-tips-for-savvy-medical-web-surfing/</link>
	<description>Health Information &#124; Geekery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:05:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/21/nitpicks-cnns-tips-for-savvy-medical-web-surfing/comment-page-1/#comment-128564</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/21/nitpicks-cnns-tips-for-savvy-medical-web-surfing/#comment-128564</guid>
		<description>Danny-

Good for you.  But it isn&#039;t comparable to MedlinePlus, the links are NOT vetted by health profesionals, and the top results are NOT high-quality sources of authoritative information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny-</p>
<p>Good for you.  But it isn&#8217;t comparable to MedlinePlus, the links are NOT vetted by health profesionals, and the top results are NOT high-quality sources of authoritative information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Tips for Savvy Medical Web Surfing&#8221; - A Critique &#171; Women&#8217;s Health News</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/21/nitpicks-cnns-tips-for-savvy-medical-web-surfing/comment-page-1/#comment-128563</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Tips for Savvy Medical Web Surfing&#8221; - A Critique &#171; Women&#8217;s Health News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/21/nitpicks-cnns-tips-for-savvy-medical-web-surfing/#comment-128563</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: David notes a problem with the &#8220;search engine&#8221; section of the CNN piece. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: David notes a problem with the &#8220;search engine&#8221; section of the CNN piece. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/21/nitpicks-cnns-tips-for-savvy-medical-web-surfing/comment-page-1/#comment-128561</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/21/nitpicks-cnns-tips-for-savvy-medical-web-surfing/#comment-128561</guid>
		<description>I checked iMedix compared to the other search engines and i like it better. More relevant and i also get to talk to people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked iMedix compared to the other search engines and i like it better. More relevant and i also get to talk to people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/21/nitpicks-cnns-tips-for-savvy-medical-web-surfing/comment-page-1/#comment-128558</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/21/nitpicks-cnns-tips-for-savvy-medical-web-surfing/#comment-128558</guid>
		<description>David, you&#039;re absolutely right about the comparison. I focused on the PubMed bit because the approach to article-reading immediately irritated me, but you make a very good point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, you&#8217;re absolutely right about the comparison. I focused on the PubMed bit because the approach to article-reading immediately irritated me, but you make a very good point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
