All Your HealthBase Are Belong to Us (Updated 9/3/2009)

[Update]

The folks at Netbase have issued an apology:

Our first release of healthBase yesterday surfaced a few embarrassing and offensive bugs. These were far in the minority of results but enough to keep us up late improving the site. We sincerely regret and apologize in particular for any offense caused.

…I wasn’t offended. I just thought the tool was awful.

[/Update]

TechCrunch called healthBase “The Ultimate Medical Content Search Engine.”

I beg to differ. Rather than getting into what it is supposed to do, lets just try a few queries and see how its semantic technologies perform.

First, a search for causes of AIDS.

As a Red Sea Pedestrian myself, I’m fascinated to learn that Jews cause AIDS. Huh. What if I was a Jewish Physiotherapist? How would I live with myself?

Next, we’ll look at the “Pros & Cons of lithotripsy”:

Take a look at the “Pros” list. These are just partial phrases describing what lithotripsy is. This list of pros and cons make no sense at all.

Among the sources it searches:
- Wikipedia
- NaturalNews.com (Check out the embedded video in the right sidebar and listen to the lyrics- there’s some idiotic stuff there)

I’d recommend to healthBase that they dump these and instead search sites like MedlinePlus.

HealthBase isn’t even a good medical content search engine, much less the “ultimate”.

5 thoughts on “All Your HealthBase Are Belong to Us (Updated 9/3/2009)

  1. Pingback: Quick Hit: HealthBase Solves All Ills — Hoyden About Town

  2. Pingback: HealthBase Cures All Ills « Wildly Parenthetical

  3. Pingback: Roughtheory.org » Enjoy Your Symptom!

  4. Pingback: MEDLIB’s ROUND 1.6 « Laika’s MedLibLog