<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>davidrothman.net &#187; Web Geekery in Recent Literature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidrothman.net/category/technology/web-geekery-in-recent-literature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidrothman.net</link>
	<description>Health Information &#124; Geekery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:54:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Web Geekery in Recent Literature, 9/1/2009</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/09/01/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-912009/</link>
		<comments>http://davidrothman.net/2009/09/01/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-912009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Social Software"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Social Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Geekery in Recent Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/?p=2725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to another installment of Web Geekery in Recent Literature, where we point out recent articles in the indexed literature of potential interest to the Geeky and Web-obsessed.
Plagiarism of online material may be proven using the Internet Archive Wayback Machine (archive.org).
PMID: 19716663
Many writers and researchers are reluctant to publish online for fear that their work [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to another installment of <em>Web Geekery in Recent Literature</em>, where we point out recent articles in the indexed literature of potential interest to the Geeky and Web-obsessed.</p>
<p><strong>Plagiarism of online material may be proven using the Internet Archive Wayback Machine (archive.org).</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19717700?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 19716663</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Many writers and researchers are reluctant to publish online for fear that their work will be plagiarized and used without attribution elsewhere. For example, junior or freelance researchers may worry that their ideas will be &#8217;stolen&#8217; and published under the name of professional or senior researchers; and that then it could be hard to convince people that in fact the idea had originated elsewhere. However, if this happens, plagiarism may be objectively proven by a service called the Internet Archive Wayback Machine (archive.org). Archive.org permits clarification of the issue of dates &#8211; and allows the reader to draw their own conclusions about authorship, whether charitable or otherwise. In sum, archive.org is a little known, freely available and potentially very useful mechanism for defending intellectual property rights.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d be willing to be that there&#8217;s not a single librarian reader of this blog who wasn&#8217;t already quite aware of the <a href="http://www.archive.org/web/web.php">Wayback Machine</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Medical professionalism in the age of online social networking.</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19717700?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 19717700</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The rapid emergence and exploding usage of online social networking forums, which are frequented by millions, present clinicians with new ethical and professional challenges. Particularly among a younger generation of physicians and patients, the use of online social networking forums has become widespread. In this article, we discuss ethical challenges facing the patient-doctor relationship as a result of the growing use of online social networking forums. We draw upon one heavily used and highly trafficked forum, Facebook, to illustrate the elements of these online environments and the ethical challenges peculiar to their novel form of exchange. Finally, we present guidelines for clinicians to negotiate responsibly and professionally their possible uses of these social forums.</p></blockquote>
<p>Huh.  This seems <a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2517936">somehow familiar&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p><strong>Informed patients are not a threat.</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19717986?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 19717986 </a></p>
<blockquote><p>We&#8217;ve all been there; the embarrassing realisation that, despite being a so-called health-care professional and the supposed fount of all knowledge, a patient or relative knows more about a condition than we do. Some of us can take it on the chin and defer, after all, the internet and modern media has made access to information that much easier &#8211; anyone with a PC and a spare half an hour can find out exactly how Dengue fever is transmitted (by the Aedes aegypti mosquito, in case you are interested). Not everyone can be that magnanimous though &#8211; as a student, I remember being intensely annoyed by a woman who told me that I was being impatient with her husband, a man with Alzheimer&#8217;s, and that I needed to adopt a calmer approach when I took him to the toilet. She was right, of course &#8211; but I was simply furious.</p></blockquote>
<p>Say it with me, clinicians: &#8220;Informed patients are not a threat.&#8221;  Make it your mantra.</p>
<p><em>(This comment dedicated to <a href="http://patientdave.blogspot.com/">e-patient Dave</a>.)</em>
<p>
_______________<br />
<strong>Feed-only Footer:</strong><br />
[This space for rent]  Want to reach about 3,500 RSS subscribers to this feed?  Please get in touch.<br />
<img src="http://services.nexodyne.com/email/icon/ohP3Htky8azEyIC0VA%3D%3D/gK76Zpo%3D/R01haWw%3D/0/image.png"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidrothman.net/2009/09/01/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-912009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook and the Green-Eyed Monster of Jealousy (WGiRL &#8211; 8/4/2009)</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/08/04/facebook-and-the-green-eyed-monster-of-jealousy-wgirl-842009/</link>
		<comments>http://davidrothman.net/2009/08/04/facebook-and-the-green-eyed-monster-of-jealousy-wgirl-842009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For Medical Libraryfolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Social Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Geekery in Recent Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/?p=2608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heh.
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Aug;12(4):441-4.
More information than you ever wanted: does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy?
Muise A, Christofides E, Desmarais S.
Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. amuise@uoguelph.ca
The social network site Facebook is a rapidly expanding phenomenon that is changing the nature of social relationships. Anecdotal evidence, including information described in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh.</p>
<p>Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Aug;12(4):441-4.<br />
More information than you ever wanted: does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy?<br />
Muise A, Christofides E, Desmarais S.</p>
<p>Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. amuise@uoguelph.ca</p>
<p>The social network site Facebook is a rapidly expanding phenomenon that is changing the nature of social relationships. Anecdotal evidence, including information described in the popular media, suggests that Facebook may be responsible for creating jealousy and suspicion in romantic relationships. The objectives of the present study were to explore the role of Facebook in the experience of jealousy and to determine if increased Facebook exposure predicts jealousy above and beyond personal and relationship factors. Three hundred eight undergraduate students completed an online survey that assessed demographic and personality factors and explored respondents&#8217; Facebook use. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis, controlling for individual, personality, and relationship factors, revealed that increased Facebook use significantly predicts Facebook-related jealousy. We argue that this effect may be the result of a feedback loop whereby using Facebook exposes people to often ambiguous information about their partner that they may not otherwise have access to and that this new information incites further Facebook use. Our study provides evidence of Facebook&#8217;s unique contributions to the experience of jealousy in romantic relationships.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19366318">PMID: 19366318</a>
<p>
_______________<br />
<strong>Feed-only Footer:</strong><br />
[This space for rent]  Want to reach about 3,500 RSS subscribers to this feed?  Please get in touch.<br />
<img src="http://services.nexodyne.com/email/icon/ohP3Htky8azEyIC0VA%3D%3D/gK76Zpo%3D/R01haWw%3D/0/image.png"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidrothman.net/2009/08/04/facebook-and-the-green-eyed-monster-of-jealousy-wgirl-842009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MedlineRanker</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/08/03/medlineranker/</link>
		<comments>http://davidrothman.net/2009/08/03/medlineranker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 05:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3rd Party PubMed/MEDLINE Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[For Medical Libraryfolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Geekery in Recent Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/?p=2601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Learned about MedlineRanker through this recent article:
The biomedical literature is represented by millions of abstracts available in the Medline database. These abstracts can be queried with the PubMed interface, which provides a keyword-based Boolean search engine. This approach shows limitations in the retrieval of abstracts related to very specific topics, as it is difficult for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Learned about <a href="http://cbdm.mdc-berlin.de/tools/medlineranker">MedlineRanker</a> through this recent article:</p>
<blockquote><p>The biomedical literature is represented by millions of abstracts available in the Medline database. These abstracts can be queried with the PubMed interface, which provides a keyword-based Boolean search engine. This approach shows limitations in the retrieval of abstracts related to very specific topics, as it is difficult for a non-expert user to find all of the most relevant keywords related to a biomedical topic. Additionally, when searching for more general topics, the same approach may return hundreds of unranked references. To address these issues, text mining tools have been developed to help scientists focus on relevant abstracts. We have implemented the MedlineRanker webserver, which allows a flexible ranking of Medline for a topic of interest without expert knowledge. Given some abstracts related to a topic, the program deduces automatically the most discriminative words in comparison to a random selection. These words are used to score other abstracts, including those from not yet annotated recent publications, which can be then ranked by relevance. We show that our tool can be highly accurate and that it is able to process millions of abstracts in a practical amount of time. MedlineRanker is free for use and is available at http://cbdm.mdc-berlin.de/tools/medlineranker.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&#038;Cmd=DetailsSearch&#038;Term=medlineranker[All+Fields]">[PubMed]</a><br />
Free Full Text: [<a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&#038;pubmedid=19429696">HTML</a>] [<a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=2703945&#038;blobtype=pdf">PDF</a>]<br />
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 July 1; 37: W141–W146.<br />
Published online 2009 July 1. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp353.<br />
PMCID: PMC2703945
<p>
_______________<br />
<strong>Feed-only Footer:</strong><br />
[This space for rent]  Want to reach about 3,500 RSS subscribers to this feed?  Please get in touch.<br />
<img src="http://services.nexodyne.com/email/icon/ohP3Htky8azEyIC0VA%3D%3D/gK76Zpo%3D/R01haWw%3D/0/image.png"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidrothman.net/2009/08/03/medlineranker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Evaluation of the Five Most Used Evidence Based Bedside Information Tools in Canadian Health Libraries</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2008/06/20/an-evaluation-of-the-five-most-used-evidence-based-bedside-information-tools-in-canadian-health-libraries/</link>
		<comments>http://davidrothman.net/2008/06/20/an-evaluation-of-the-five-most-used-evidence-based-bedside-information-tools-in-canadian-health-libraries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For Medical Libraryfolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Geekery in Recent Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2008/06/20/an-evaluation-of-the-five-most-used-evidence-based-bedside-information-tools-in-canadian-health-libraries/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Farrell, Alison. &#8220;An Evaluation of the Five Most Used Evidence Based Bedside Information Tools in Canadian Health Libraries&#8221; Evidence Based Library and Information Practice [Online], 3 17 Jun 2008 
Full text (PDF)
Abstract
Objective – This project sought to identify the five most used evidence based bedside information tools used in Canadian health libraries, to examine librarians’ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farrell, Alison. &#8220;An Evaluation of the Five Most Used Evidence Based Bedside Information Tools in Canadian Health Libraries&#8221; Evidence Based Library and Information Practice [Online], 3 17 Jun 2008 </p>
<p><a href="http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/1515/1240">Full text (PDF)</a></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<p>Objective – This project sought to identify the five most used evidence based bedside information tools used in Canadian health libraries, to examine librarians’ attitudes towards these tools, and to test the comprehensiveness of the tools.</p>
<p>Methods – The author developed a definition of evidence based bedside information tools and a list of resources that fit this definition. Participants were respondents to a survey distributed via the CANMEDLIB electronic mail list. The survey sought to identify information from library staff regarding the most frequently used evidence based bedside information tools. Clinical questions were used to measure the comprehensiveness of each resource and the levels of evidence they provided to each question.</p>
<p>Results – Survey respondents reported that the five most used evidence based bedside information tools in their libraries were UpToDate, BMJ Clinical Evidence, First Consult, Bandolier and ACP Pier. Librarians were generally satisfied with the ease of use, efficiency and informative nature of these resources. The resource assessment determined that not all of these tools are comprehensive in terms of their ability to answer clinical questions or with regard to the inclusion of levels of evidence. UpToDate was able to provide information for the greatest number of clinical questions, but it provided a level of evidence only seven percent of the time. ACP Pier was able to provide information on only 50% of the clinical questions, but it provided levels of evidence for all of these.</p>
<p>Conclusion – UpToDate and BMJ Clinical Evidence were both rated as easy to use and informative. However, neither product generally includes levels of evidence, so it would be prudent for the practitioner to critically appraise information from these sources before using it in a patient care setting. ACP Pier eliminates the critical appraisal stage, thus reducing the time it takes to go from forming a clinical question to implementing the answer, but survey respondents did not rate it as high in terms of usability. There remains a need for user-friendly, comprehensive resources that provide evidence summaries relying on levels of evidence to support their conclusions.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/1515/1240">Full text (PDF)</a>
<p>
_______________<br />
<strong>Feed-only Footer:</strong><br />
[This space for rent]  Want to reach about 3,500 RSS subscribers to this feed?  Please get in touch.<br />
<img src="http://services.nexodyne.com/email/icon/ohP3Htky8azEyIC0VA%3D%3D/gK76Zpo%3D/R01haWw%3D/0/image.png"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidrothman.net/2008/06/20/an-evaluation-of-the-five-most-used-evidence-based-bedside-information-tools-in-canadian-health-libraries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Melissa Rethlefsen on Connotea in JMLA</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2008/04/05/melissa-rethlefsen-on-connotea-in-jmla/</link>
		<comments>http://davidrothman.net/2008/04/05/melissa-rethlefsen-on-connotea-in-jmla/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Social Software"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[For Medical Libraryfolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Geekery in Recent Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2008/04/05/melissa-rethlefsen-on-connotea-in-jmla/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
If you&#8217;re looking for an excellent introduction to Nature&#8217;s social bookmarking service for scientists, check out Melissa Rethlefsen&#8217;s review in the April 2008 JMLA. [HTML] [PDF]

_______________
Feed-only Footer:
[This space for rent]  Want to reach about 3,500 RSS subscribers to this feed?  Please get in touch.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.connotea.org/"><img src="http://davidrothman.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/connotealogo.png"/></a> <img src="http://davidrothman.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/jmlalogo.png"/></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking for an excellent introduction to Nature&#8217;s social bookmarking service for scientists, check out Melissa Rethlefsen&#8217;s review in the April 2008 JMLA. [<a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2268226">HTML</a>] [<a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=2268226&#038;blobtype=pdf">PDF</a>]
<p>
_______________<br />
<strong>Feed-only Footer:</strong><br />
[This space for rent]  Want to reach about 3,500 RSS subscribers to this feed?  Please get in touch.<br />
<img src="http://services.nexodyne.com/email/icon/ohP3Htky8azEyIC0VA%3D%3D/gK76Zpo%3D/R01haWw%3D/0/image.png"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidrothman.net/2008/04/05/melissa-rethlefsen-on-connotea-in-jmla/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Geekery in Recent Literature: 4/3/08</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2008/04/03/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-4208/</link>
		<comments>http://davidrothman.net/2008/04/03/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-4208/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Health Info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[For Medical Libraryfolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Social Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Geekery in Recent Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2008/04/02/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-4208/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Apr;5(4):593-7.
Quality of CT colonography-related web sites for consumers.
Sheran J, Dachman AH.
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
PURPOSE: Patients often request to undergo computed tomographic colonography (CTC) from radiologists or referring physicians on the basis of their personal examination of information on the Web. Therefore, the authors [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Apr;5(4):593-7.<br />
<strong>Quality of CT colonography-related web sites for consumers.</strong><br />
Sheran J, Dachman AH.</p>
<p>Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.</p>
<p>PURPOSE: Patients often request to undergo computed tomographic colonography (CTC) from radiologists or referring physicians on the basis of their personal examination of information on the Web. Therefore, the authors examined the information on CTC and virtual colonoscopy available for consumers on the Web to assess its quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The term virtual colonoscopy was entered into 3 popular search engines: Google, Yahoo, and MSN. In each case, evaluation was limited to the first 50 Web sites, or hits, which were recorded and analyzed for content, comprehensiveness, and accuracy. RESULTS: Sixty-seven Web sites were deemed appropriate for further analysis. More than half of the sites reported currency dates more than 2 years old. Only a third of the sites included information about the risk factors for colorectal cancer. About a third of the sites did not explain the indications for the use of CTC, and the remaining sites lacked consistent descriptions of the indications. Few Web sites offered or described the option of performing same-day optical colonoscopy for patients with abnormal results on CTC. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that patients are often armed with very incomplete information from Web sites on CTC. Web sites were often found to be outdated, to contain conflicting information, and were lacking descriptions of patient risk factors for colorectal cancer. Several suggestions are made to improve the dissemination of comprehensive, current, and accurate information.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18359448?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 18359448</a></p>
<p>_____________________________</p>
<p>Hum Reprod. 2008 Mar 27 [Epub ahead of print]<br />
<strong>Infertility information on the World Wide Web: a cross-sectional survey of quality of infertility information on the internet in the UK.</strong><br />
Marriott JV, Stec P, El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Braude P, Coomarasamy A.</p>
<p>Assisted Conception Unit, Guy&#8217;s and St. Thomas&#8217; Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Thomas Guy House, Guys Hospital, 4th Floor, London SE1 9RT, UK.</p>
<p>BACKGROUND The internet is a frequently used source of information for infertile couples. Previous studies suggested that the quality of health information on the internet is poor. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of websites providing information on infertility and its management in the UK. Differences between website types and affiliations were assessed. METHODS A Google search for the keyword &#8216;infertility&#8217; was performed and 107 relevant websites were identified and categorized by type. Websites were assessed for credibility, accuracy and ease of navigation using predefined criteria. RESULTS The total scores for all types of websites were low, particularly in the accuracy category. Websites affiliated to the UK National Health Service (NHS) scored higher than those affiliated to private fertility clinics and other clinics providing non-conventional fertility treatment. Specifically, NHS websites were more likely to report success rates (92.9% versus 60% and 0%, P PMID: 18372253</p>
<p>_____________________________</p>
<p>Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Feb 15;72(1):10.<br />
<strong>Online social networking issues within academia and pharmacy education.</strong> [<a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&#038;pubmedid=18322572">Free full text</a>]<br />
Cain J.</p>
<p>University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, USA.</p>
<p>Online social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace are extremely popular as indicated by the numbers of members and visits to the sites. They allow students to connect with users with similar interests, build and maintain relationships with friends, and feel more connected with their campus. The foremost criticisms of online social networking are that students may open themselves to public scrutiny of their online personas and risk physical safety by revealing excessive personal information. This review outlines issues of online social networking in higher education by drawing upon articles in both the lay press and academic publications. New points for pharmacy educators to consider include the possible emergence of an &#8220;e-professionalism&#8221; concept; legal and ethical implications of using online postings in admission, discipline, and student safety decisions; how online personas may blend into professional life; and the responsibility for educating students about the risks of online social networking.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18322572?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 18322572</a></p>
<p>_____________________________</p>
<p>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Feb 15;71(3):441-4.<br />
<strong>SCAI launches seconds-count.org: An interventional cardiology resource for patients and physicians.</strong><br />
Weiner BH, Marshall JJ.</p>
<p>St Vincent Hospital at Worcester Medical Center, Worcester, MA 01608, USA. president@scai.org</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18288740?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 18288740</a> </p>
<p><strong>[Okay, not a lot in the abstract, but <a href="http://www.seconds-count.org/">check out the site</a>.]</strong>
<p>
_______________<br />
<strong>Feed-only Footer:</strong><br />
[This space for rent]  Want to reach about 3,500 RSS subscribers to this feed?  Please get in touch.<br />
<img src="http://services.nexodyne.com/email/icon/ohP3Htky8azEyIC0VA%3D%3D/gK76Zpo%3D/R01haWw%3D/0/image.png"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidrothman.net/2008/04/03/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-4208/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Geekery in Recent Literature, 3/24/2008</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2008/03/24/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-3242008/</link>
		<comments>http://davidrothman.net/2008/03/24/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-3242008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For Medical Libraryfolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Geekery in Recent Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2008/03/24/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-3242008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wikis in HIM education:
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2008 Jan 30;5:1. (Free full text: HTML &#124; PDF)
Using wiki in an online record documentation systems course.
Harris ST, Zeng X.
College of Allied Health Sciences at East Carolina University in Greenville, NC, USA.
We report a case study using a wiki tool, Confluence, including a brief history, current status, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wikis in HIM education:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2008 Jan 30;5:1. (Free full text: <a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&#038;pubmedid=18311325">HTML</a> | <a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=2242345&#038;blobtype=pdf">PDF</a>)<br />
<strong>Using wiki in an online record documentation systems course.</strong><br />
Harris ST, Zeng X.</p>
<p>College of Allied Health Sciences at East Carolina University in Greenville, NC, USA.</p>
<p>We report a case study using a wiki tool, Confluence, including a brief history, current status, and motivations for using Confluence. We describe how we created two spaces on Confluence for two consecutive classes, 2006 and 2007, in a health information management baccalaureate online course, Record Documentation Systems. The 2006 class contained 12 groups consisting of 52 students. The 2007 class contained six groups consisting of 30 students. We describe how two collaborative pages for each of the groups are created and used by the groups for the group project. Survey results illustrated that 44 percent of the students in 2006 and 50 percent in 2007 agree Confluence is a tool for facilitating learning; 58 percent in 2006 and 50 percent in 2007 agree it is a tool for student activities; 52 percent in 2006 and 36 percent in 2007 agree it is a medium for reflective group interaction; and 38 percent in 2006 and 36 percent in 2007 want to see its application in other courses.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18311325?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 18311325</a></p></blockquote>
<p>____________________________________</p>
<blockquote><p>J Altern Complement Med. 2007 Nov;13(9):1035-43.<br />
<strong>Evaluation of internet websites marketing herbal weight-loss supplements to consumers.</strong><br />
Jordan MA, Haywood T.</p>
<p>Midwestern University, College of Pharmacy-Glendale, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA. mjorda@midwestern.edu</p>
<p>OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and quantity of drug information available to consumers on Internet websites marketing herbal weight-loss dietary supplements in the United States. METHODS: We conducted an Internet search using the search engines Yahoo and Google and the keywords &#8220;herbal weight loss.&#8221; Website content was evaluated for the presence of active/inactive ingredient names and strengths and other Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling requirements. Information related to drug safety for the most common herbal ingredients in the products evaluated was compared against standard herbal drug information references. RESULTS: Thirty-two (32) websites were evaluated for labeling requirements and safety information. All sites listed an FDA disclaimer statement and most sites (84.4%) listed active ingredients, although few listed strengths or inactive ingredients. Based on the drug information for the most common ingredients found in the weight-loss dietary supplements evaluated, potential contraindications for cardiovascular conditions, pregnancy/nursing, and high blood pressure were listed most frequently (73%, 65.5%, and 37%, respectively), whereas few websites listed potential drug interactions or adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Potential hazards posed by dietary supplements may not be accurately, if at all, represented on Internet websites selling these products. Since consumers may not approach their physicians or pharmacists for information regarding use of dietary supplements in weight loss, it becomes necessary for health care providers to actively engage their patients in open discussion regarding the use, benefits, and hazards of dietary supplements.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18047451?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 18047451</a></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>So&#8230;the potential hazards of dietary supplements are often not well explained by the Web sites selling them?  I am shocked, I tell you.  <em>Shocked</em>.</strong></p>
<p>____________________________________</p>
<p><strong>Imagine trying to conduct user needs assessments for the NIH/NLM Web sites</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>J Med Internet Res. 2008 Feb 15;10(1):e4. <a href="http://www.jmir.org/2008/1/e4/">[Free full text]</a><br />
<strong>Web evaluation at the US National Institutes of Health: use of the American Customer Satisfaction Index online customer survey.</strong><br />
Wood FB, Siegel ER, Feldman S, Love CB, Rodrigues D, Malamud M, Lagana M, Crafts J.</p>
<p>National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. fredwood@mail.nih.gov</p>
<p>BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health (NIH), US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), realized the need to better understand its Web users in order to help assure that websites are user friendly and well designed for effective information dissemination. A trans-NIH group proposed a trans-NIH project to implement an online customer survey, known as the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) survey, on a large number of NIH websites-the first &#8220;enterprise-wide&#8221; ACSI application, and probably the largest enterprise Web evaluation of any kind, in the US government. The proposal was funded by the NIH Evaluation Set-Aside Program for two years at a cost of US $1.5 million (US $1.275 million for survey licenses for 60 websites at US $18000 per website; US $225,000 for a project evaluation contractor). OBJECTIVE: The overall project objectives were to assess the value added to the participating NIH websites of using the ACSI online survey, identify any NIH-wide benefits (and limitations) of the ACSI, ascertain any new understanding about the NIH Web presence based on ACSI survey results, and evaluate the effectiveness of a trans-NIH approach to Web evaluation. This was not an experimental study and was not intended to evaluate the ACSI survey methodology, per se, or the impacts of its use on customer satisfaction with NIH websites. METHODS: The evaluation methodology included baseline pre-project websites profiles; before and after email surveys of participating website teams; interviews with a representative cross-section of website staff; observations of debriefing meetings with website teams; observations at quarterly trans-NIH Web staff meetings and biweekly trans-NIH leadership team meetings; and review and analysis of secondary data. RESULTS: Of the original 60 NIH websites signed up, 55 implemented the ACSI survey, 42 generated sufficient data for formal reporting of survey results for their sites, and 51 completed the final project survey. A broad cross-section of websites participated, and a majority reported significant benefits and new knowledge gained from the ACSI survey results. NIH websites as a group scored consistently higher on overall customer satisfaction relative to US government-wide and private sector benchmarks. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the enterprise-wide experiment was successful. On the level of individual websites, the project confirmed the value of online customer surveys as a Web evaluation method. The evaluation results indicated that successful use of the ACSI, whether site-by-site or enterprise-wide, depends in large part on strong staff and management support and adequate funding and time for the use of such evaluative methods. In the age of Web-based e-government, a broad commitment to Web evaluation may well be needed. This commitment would help assure that the potential of the Web and other information technologies to improve customer and citizen satisfaction is fully realized.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18276580?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 18276580</a></p></blockquote>
<p>____________________________________</p>
<blockquote><p>Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Feb 7<br />
<strong>Using the Internet to search for cancer clinical trials: A comparative audit of clinical trial search tools.</strong><br />
Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Massett HA, Leonard CR, Grama L, Manrow R.</p>
<p>Department of Public and Community Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.</p>
<p>Advancing the clinical trial research process to improve cancer treatment necessitates helping people with cancer identify and enroll in studies, and researchers are using the power of the Internet to facilitate this process. This study used a content analysis of online cancer clinical trial search tools to understand what people with cancer might encounter. The content analysis revealed that clinical trial search tools were easy to identify using a popular search engine, but their functionality and content varied greatly. Most required that users be fairly knowledgeable about their medical condition and sophisticated in their web navigation skills. The ability to search by a specific health condition or type of cancer was the most common search strategy. The more complex tools required that users input detailed information about their personal medical history and have knowledge of specific clinical trial terminology. Search tools, however, only occasionally advised users to consult their doctors regarding clinical trial decision-making. This, along with the complexity of the tools suggests that online search tools may not adequately facilitate the clinical trial recruitment process. Findings from this analysis can be used as a framework from which to systematically examine actual consumer experience with online clinical trial search tools.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18346942?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 18346942</a></p></blockquote>
<p>____________________________________</p>
<blockquote><p>Health Promot Pract. 2008 Jan;9(1):59-67. Epub 2007 Aug 28.<br />
<strong>An evaluation of community health center adoption of online health information.</strong><br />
Martinez MA, Kind T, Pezo E, Pomerantz KL.</p>
<p>Minnesota Department of Human Services, St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0986, USA. meredith.martinez@state.mn.us</p>
<p>Health care providers and patients in community health centers often lack access to online scientific and patient education resources. These resources can improve medical decision making and promote communication between provider and patient. In 2000, a community health information program, Partners for Health Information, provided 10 community health centers in Washington, D.C. with computers, training, and consumer health resources, supplemented with visits to coach patients and staff in their use. The purpose of this study is to assess the adoption of the use of online health information among staff in seven of these health centers. The methods of this evaluation were designed to measure frequency of patient referral by health center staff to online health information and to describe providers&#8217; perceptions of the barriers and enablers to using online resources. Recommendations made by respondents can be used to modify the Partners program and guide the development of other similar programs.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17728203?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 17728203</a></p></blockquote>
<p>____________________________________</p>
<blockquote><p>Healthc Q. 2008;11(1):104-8, 110, 4.<br />
<strong>Web 2.0 and chronic illness: new horizons, new opportunities.</strong> <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/industries/ca/en/healthcare/files/eh_vol6_no3_Seeman.pdf">[Free full text]</a><br />
Seeman N.</p>
<p>IBM&#8217;s Global Buisness Services, Toronto. neil@ca.ibm.com</p>
<p>&#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; heralds a breakthrough opportunity for empowering healthcare consumers of all types, and especially for those suffering from different forms of chronic illness. As the author shows using some data gathered from a popular social networking website&#8211;MySpace.com&#8211;this opportunity may be greatest for heavily stigmatized chronic health issues, such as obesity and mental illness.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18326388?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 18326388</a></p></blockquote>
<p>
_______________<br />
<strong>Feed-only Footer:</strong><br />
[This space for rent]  Want to reach about 3,500 RSS subscribers to this feed?  Please get in touch.<br />
<img src="http://services.nexodyne.com/email/icon/ohP3Htky8azEyIC0VA%3D%3D/gK76Zpo%3D/R01haWw%3D/0/image.png"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidrothman.net/2008/03/24/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-3242008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Geekery in Recent Literature &#8211; 2/27/2007</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/27/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-2252007/</link>
		<comments>http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/27/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-2252007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 05:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For Medical Libraryfolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Geekery in Recent Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/25/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-2252007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Med Teach. 2008;30(1):10-16.
&#8216;Net Generation&#8217; medical students: technological experiences of pre-clinical and clinical students.
Kennedy G, Gray K, Tse J.
University of Melbourne, Australia.
Background: While institutions have been keen to integrate information and communication technologies into medical education, little is known about the technological experiences of the current cohort of so-called &#8216;Net Generation&#8217; students. Aims: This study investigated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Med Teach. 2008;30(1):10-16.<br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez/18278643">&#8216;Net Generation&#8217; medical students: technological experiences of pre-clinical and clinical students.</a><br />
Kennedy G, Gray K, Tse J.<br />
University of Melbourne, Australia.<br />
Background: While institutions have been keen to integrate information and communication technologies into medical education, little is known about the technological experiences of the current cohort of so-called &#8216;Net Generation&#8217; students. Aims: This study investigated the technological experiences of medical students and determined whether there were differences between pre-clinical and clinical students. Method: In 2006, 207 pre-clinical and 161 clinical students studying medicine at a major Australian university were surveyed. The questionnaire asked students about their access to, use of and skills with an array of technologies and technology-based tools. Results: The results show that access to mobile phones, memory sticks, desktop computers, and broadband Internet connections was high while technologies such as PDAs were used in very low numbers. A factor analysis of students&#8217; use of 39 technology-based tools revealed nine clear activity types, including the &#8217;standard&#8217; use of computers and mobile-phones, and the use of the Internet as a pastime activity, for podcasting and for accessing services. A comparison of pre-clinical and clinical students revealed a number of significant differences in terms of the frequency and skill with which these students use distinct technology-based tools. Conclusions: The findings inform current technology-based teaching and learning activities and shed light on potential areas of educational technology development.<br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez/18278643">PMID: 18278643</a></p>
<p><strong>David wonders:</strong> Does &#8220;Net Generation&#8221; = &#8220;Digital Natives&#8221; = &#8220;GenX/GenY&#8221;?</p>
<p>________</p>
<p>Support Care Cancer. 2008 Feb 22<br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18293014?dopt=Abstract">Internet use by cancer survivors: current use and future wishes.</a><br />
van de Poll-Franse LV, van Eenbergen MC.<br />
Comprehensive Cancer Centre South (IKZ), Eindhoven Cancer Registry, P.O. box 231, 5600 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, l.vd.poll@ikz.nl.</p>
<p>OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent of internet access and use and patient characteristics associated with internet use. We also aimed to study when and at which sites cancer patients search for information, the self-reported effect on health care use, and patients&#8217; wishes with respect to future internet possibilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We drew a sample of 390 patients diagnosed with breast (n = 128), prostate (n = 96), or gynecological (n = 89) cancer or lymphoma (n = 77) in four different hospitals in the period 2002-2004, who were 65 years or younger at diagnosis. These patients were sent a questionnaire that contained 45 questions about demographics and three broad applications of internet use: content, communication, community. RESULTS: Of the 261 (75%) patients who responded, 60% used Internet by themselves, 9% via others, whereas 31% did not use the Internet. High education, young age, and high socio-economic status were all independently positively associated with internet use. Of the patients with complaints but pre-diagnosis, 41% searched the Internet for information about cancer daily to several times a week. After diagnosis, during treatment, and at follow-up, this was, respectively, 71%, 56%, and 4%. Although patients preferred to get reliable information from the Web site of their oncologist (88%), hospital (70%) or Dutch Cancer Society (76%), Web sites that are completely financed and created by pharmaceutical industries were mentioned most as source of information. Patients who used the Internet to find information about cancer felt themselves to be better informed about their disease (72%); only 3% thought that consulting the Internet increased the frequency of visiting their doctor, whereas 20% felt that information from the Internet influenced the treatment decision made by their doctor. Most patients who use the Internet would like to be able to access their own medical file (79%) or test results (81%) if possible. CONCLUSION: Many cancer patients use the Internet to find reliable information about their disease and treatment. Patient information centers from hospitals should be strongly encouraged to improve disease and treatment information facilities on their hospital Web site, especially since most patients view their oncologist still as the most important source of information.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18293014?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 18293014</a></p>
<p><strong>David notes:</strong> I suppose that it is good to have a supporting study, but I wasn&#8217;t aware that there was any doubt about the fact that a lot of patients in comparatively wired (affluent) nations dealing with any illness &#8220;use the Internet to find reliable information about their disease and treatment.&#8221;<br />
<strong>Take-home lesson for hospital libraries:</strong> &#8220;Patient information centers from hospitals should be strongly encouraged to improve disease and treatment information facilities on their hospital Web site&#8221;</p>
<p>________</p>
<p>BMC Public Health. 2008 Feb 21;8(1):69<br />
<a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/8/69/abstract">Health information seeking on the Internet: a double divide? Results from a representative survey in the Paris metropolitan area, France, 2005-2006.</a><br />
Renahy E, Parizot I, Chauvin P.<br />
<a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2458-8-69.pdf">[Free full text PDF]</a></p>
<p>ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The Internet is a major source of information for professionals and the general public, especially in the field of health. However, despite ever-increasing connection rates, a digital divide persists in the industrialised countries. The objective of this study was to assess the determinants involved in: 1) having or not having Internet access; and 2) using or not using the Internet to obtain health information. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of a representative random sample was conducted in the Paris metropolitan area, France, in the fall of 2005 (n = 3023). RESULTS: Close to 70% of the adult population had Internet access, and 49% of Internet users had previously searched for medical information. Economic and social disparities observed in online health information seeking are reinforced by the economic and social disparities in Internet access, hence a double divide. While individuals who reported having a recent health problem were less likely to have Internet access (odds ratio (OR): 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-0.98), it is they who, when they have Internet access, are the most likely to search for health information (OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.11-1.87). CONCLUSIONS: In the French context of universal health insurance, access to the Internet varies according to social and socioeconomic status and health status, and its use for health information seeking varies also with health beliefs, but not to health insurance coverage or health-care utilisation. Certain economic and social inequalities seem to impact cumulatively on Internet access and on the use of the Internet for health information seeking. It is not obvious that the Internet is a special information tool for primary prevention in people who are the furthest removed from health concerns. However, the Internet appears to be a useful complement for secondary prevention, especially for better understanding health problems or enhancing therapeutic compliance.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18291024?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 18291024</a></p>
<p><strong>David notes:</strong> Inside or outside of the context of universal healthcare, it isn&#8217;t at all surprising to read that &#8220;access to the Internet varies according to social and socioeconomic status and health status, and its use for health information seeking varies also with health beliefs, but not to health insurance coverage or health-care utilisation.&#8221;  Are there really people who don&#8217;t understand that access to quality information depends greatly on social and economic factors even in the most wired and affluent nations?<br />
<strong>Take home lesson for hospital libraries:</strong> Again, make your hospital library Web site a gateway to the best available free information.</p>
<p>________</p>
<p>J Med Internet Res. 2008 Jan 22;10(1):e2.<br />
<a href="http://www.jmir.org/2008/1/e2/">Impact of web searching and social feedback on consumer decision making: a prospective online experiment.</a> [Free full text]<br />
&#76;&#97;&#117;&#32;&#65;&#89;&#44;&#32;&#67;&#111;&#105;&#101;&#114;&#97;&#32;&#69;&#87;&#46;<br />
&#67;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#114;&#101;&#32;&#102;&#111;&#114;&#32;&#72;&#101;&#97;&#108;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#73;&#110;&#102;&#111;&#114;&#109;&#97;&#116;&#105;&#99;&#115;&#44;&#32;&#85;&#110;&#105;&#118;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#105;&#116;&#121;&#32;&#111;&#102;&#32;&#78;&#101;&#119;&#32;&#83;&#111;&#117;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#87;&#97;&#108;&#101;&#115;&#44;&#32;&#83;&#121;&#100;&#110;&#101;&#121;&#44;&#32;&#65;&#117;&#115;&#116;&#114;&#97;&#108;&#105;&#97;&#46;<br />
&#66;&#65;&#67;&#75;&#71;&#82;&#79;&#85;&#78;&#68;&#58;&#32;&#84;&#104;&#101;&#32;&#87;&#111;&#114;&#108;&#100;&#32;&#87;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#32;&#87;&#101;&#98;&#32;&#104;&#97;&#115;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#99;&#114;&#101;&#97;&#115;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#108;&#121;&#32;&#98;&#101;&#99;&#111;&#109;&#101;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#32;&#105;&#109;&#112;&#111;&#114;&#116;&#97;&#110;&#116;&#32;&#115;&#111;&#117;&#114;&#99;&#101;&#32;&#111;&#102;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#102;&#111;&#114;&#109;&#97;&#116;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#32;&#104;&#101;&#97;&#108;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#99;&#97;&#114;&#101;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#117;&#109;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#100;&#101;&#99;&#105;&#115;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#32;&#109;&#97;&#107;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#46;&#32;&#72;&#111;&#119;&#101;&#118;&#101;&#114;&#44;&#32;&#108;&#105;&#116;&#116;&#108;&#101;&#32;&#105;&#115;&#32;&#107;&#110;&#111;&#119;&#110;&#32;&#97;&#98;&#111;&#117;&#116;&#32;&#119;&#104;&#101;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#32;&#111;&#110;&#108;&#105;&#110;&#101;&#32;&#114;&#101;&#115;&#111;&#117;&#114;&#99;&#101;&#115;&#32;&#97;&#99;&#116;&#117;&#97;&#108;&#108;&#121;&#32;&#105;&#109;&#112;&#114;&#111;&#118;&#101;&#115;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#117;&#109;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#39;&#32;&#117;&#110;&#100;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#116;&#97;&#110;&#100;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#32;&#111;&#102;&#32;&#104;&#101;&#97;&#108;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#105;&#115;&#115;&#117;&#101;&#115;&#46;&#32;&#79;&#66;&#74;&#69;&#67;&#84;&#73;&#86;&#69;&#83;&#58;&#32;&#84;&#104;&#101;&#32;&#97;&#105;&#109;&#32;&#119;&#97;&#115;&#32;&#116;&#111;&#32;&#115;&#116;&#117;&#100;&#121;&#32;&#119;&#104;&#101;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#32;&#111;&#110;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#32;&#87;&#111;&#114;&#108;&#100;&#32;&#87;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#32;&#87;&#101;&#98;&#32;&#105;&#109;&#112;&#114;&#111;&#118;&#101;&#115;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#117;&#109;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#39;&#32;&#97;&#99;&#99;&#117;&#114;&#97;&#99;&#121;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#32;&#104;&#101;&#97;&#108;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#113;&#117;&#101;&#115;&#116;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#100;&#32;&#119;&#104;&#101;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#117;&#109;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#39;&#32;&#117;&#110;&#100;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#116;&#97;&#110;&#100;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#32;&#111;&#102;&#32;&#104;&#101;&#97;&#108;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#105;&#115;&#115;&#117;&#101;&#115;&#32;&#105;&#115;&#32;&#115;&#117;&#98;&#106;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#32;&#116;&#111;&#32;&#102;&#117;&#114;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#99;&#104;&#97;&#110;&#103;&#101;&#32;&#117;&#110;&#100;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#115;&#111;&#99;&#105;&#97;&#108;&#32;&#102;&#101;&#101;&#100;&#98;&#97;&#99;&#107;&#46;&#32;&#77;&#69;&#84;&#72;&#79;&#68;&#83;&#58;&#32;&#84;&#104;&#105;&#115;&#32;&#119;&#97;&#115;&#32;&#97;&#32;&#112;&#114;&#101;&#47;&#112;&#111;&#115;&#116;&#32;&#112;&#114;&#111;&#115;&#112;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#105;&#118;&#101;&#32;&#111;&#110;&#108;&#105;&#110;&#101;&#32;&#115;&#116;&#117;&#100;&#121;&#46;&#32;&#65;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#118;&#101;&#110;&#105;&#101;&#110;&#99;&#101;&#32;&#115;&#97;&#109;&#112;&#108;&#101;&#32;&#111;&#102;&#32;&#50;&#50;&#55;&#32;&#117;&#110;&#100;&#101;&#114;&#103;&#114;&#97;&#100;&#117;&#97;&#116;&#101;&#32;&#115;&#116;&#117;&#100;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#115;&#32;&#119;&#97;&#115;&#32;&#114;&#101;&#99;&#114;&#117;&#105;&#116;&#101;&#100;&#32;&#102;&#114;&#111;&#109;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#32;&#112;&#111;&#112;&#117;&#108;&#97;&#116;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#32;&#111;&#102;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#32;&#85;&#110;&#105;&#118;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#105;&#116;&#121;&#32;&#111;&#102;&#32;&#78;&#101;&#119;&#32;&#83;&#111;&#117;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#87;&#97;&#108;&#101;&#115;&#46;&#32;&#83;&#117;&#98;&#106;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#115;&#32;&#117;&#115;&#101;&#100;&#32;&#97;&#32;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#32;&#101;&#110;&#103;&#105;&#110;&#101;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#97;&#116;&#32;&#114;&#101;&#116;&#114;&#105;&#101;&#118;&#101;&#100;&#32;&#111;&#110;&#108;&#105;&#110;&#101;&#32;&#100;&#111;&#99;&#117;&#109;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#115;&#32;&#102;&#114;&#111;&#109;&#32;&#80;&#117;&#98;&#77;&#101;&#100;&#44;&#32;&#77;&#101;&#100;&#108;&#105;&#110;&#101;&#80;&#108;&#117;&#115;&#44;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#100;&#32;&#72;&#101;&#97;&#108;&#116;&#104;&#73;&#110;&#115;&#105;&#116;&#101;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#100;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#101;&#100;&#32;&#97;&#32;&#115;&#101;&#116;&#32;&#111;&#102;&#32;&#115;&#105;&#120;&#32;&#113;&#117;&#101;&#115;&#116;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#32;&#40;&#98;&#101;&#102;&#111;&#114;&#101;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#100;&#32;&#97;&#102;&#116;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#117;&#115;&#101;&#32;&#111;&#102;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#32;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#32;&#101;&#110;&#103;&#105;&#110;&#101;&#41;&#32;&#100;&#101;&#115;&#105;&#103;&#110;&#101;&#100;&#32;&#102;&#111;&#114;&#32;&#104;&#101;&#97;&#108;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#99;&#97;&#114;&#101;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#117;&#109;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#46;&#32;&#84;&#104;&#101;&#121;&#32;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#101;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#110;&#32;&#112;&#114;&#101;&#115;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#101;&#100;&#32;&#119;&#105;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#102;&#101;&#101;&#100;&#98;&#97;&#99;&#107;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#105;&#115;&#116;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#32;&#111;&#102;&#32;&#97;&#32;&#115;&#117;&#109;&#109;&#97;&#114;&#121;&#32;&#111;&#102;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#32;&#112;&#111;&#115;&#116;&#45;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#32;&#112;&#114;&#111;&#118;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#100;&#32;&#98;&#121;&#32;&#112;&#114;&#101;&#118;&#105;&#111;&#117;&#115;&#32;&#115;&#117;&#98;&#106;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#115;&#32;&#102;&#111;&#114;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#32;&#115;&#97;&#109;&#101;&#32;&#113;&#117;&#101;&#115;&#116;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#100;&#32;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#101;&#32;&#97;&#115;&#107;&#101;&#100;&#32;&#116;&#111;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#32;&#113;&#117;&#101;&#115;&#116;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#32;&#97;&#103;&#97;&#105;&#110;&#46;&#32;&#82;&#69;&#83;&#85;&#76;&#84;&#83;&#58;&#32;&#84;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#101;&#32;&#119;&#97;&#115;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#32;&#105;&#109;&#112;&#114;&#111;&#118;&#101;&#109;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#32;&#112;&#101;&#114;&#99;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#97;&#103;&#101;&#32;&#111;&#102;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#114;&#114;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#32;&#97;&#102;&#116;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#32;&#40;&#112;&#114;&#101;&#45;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#32;&#54;&#49;&#46;&#50;&#37;&#32;&#118;&#115;&#32;&#112;&#111;&#115;&#116;&#45;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#32;&#56;&#50;&#46;&#48;&#37;&#44;&#32;&#80;&#32;&#60&#32;&#46;&#48;&#48;&#49;&#41;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#100;&#32;&#97;&#102;&#116;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#102;&#101;&#101;&#100;&#98;&#97;&#99;&#107;&#32;&#119;&#105;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#111;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#115;&#117;&#98;&#106;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#115;&#39;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#32;&#40;&#112;&#114;&#101;&#45;&#102;&#101;&#101;&#100;&#98;&#97;&#99;&#107;&#32;&#56;&#50;&#46;&#48;&#37;&#32;&#118;&#115;&#32;&#112;&#111;&#115;&#116;&#45;&#102;&#101;&#101;&#100;&#98;&#97;&#99;&#107;&#32;&#56;&#53;&#46;&#51;&#37;&#44;&#32;&#80;&#32;&#61;&#46;&#48;&#53;&#49;&#41;&#46;&#84;&#104;&#101;&#32;&#112;&#114;&#111;&#112;&#111;&#114;&#116;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#32;&#111;&#102;&#32;&#115;&#117;&#98;&#106;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#115;&#32;&#119;&#105;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#104;&#105;&#103;&#104;&#108;&#121;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#102;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#114;&#114;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#32;&#40;&#105;&#101;&#44;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#102;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#32;&#111;&#114;&#32;&#118;&#101;&#114;&#121;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#102;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#41;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#100;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#32;&#112;&#114;&#111;&#112;&#111;&#114;&#116;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#32;&#119;&#105;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#104;&#105;&#103;&#104;&#108;&#121;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#102;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#99;&#111;&#114;&#114;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#32;&#115;&#105;&#103;&#110;&#105;&#102;&#105;&#99;&#97;&#110;&#116;&#108;&#121;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#99;&#114;&#101;&#97;&#115;&#101;&#100;&#32;&#97;&#102;&#116;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#32;&#40;&#99;&#111;&#114;&#114;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#32;&#112;&#114;&#101;&#45;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#32;&#54;&#49;&#46;&#54;&#37;&#32;&#118;&#115;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#114;&#114;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#32;&#112;&#111;&#115;&#116;&#45;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#32;&#57;&#53;&#46;&#53;&#37;&#44;&#32;&#80;&#32;&#60&#46;&#48;&#48;&#49;&#59;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#99;&#111;&#114;&#114;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#32;&#112;&#114;&#101;&#45;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#32;&#53;&#53;&#46;&#51;&#37;&#32;&#118;&#115;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#99;&#111;&#114;&#114;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#32;&#112;&#111;&#115;&#116;&#45;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#32;&#56;&#50;&#46;&#48;&#37;&#44;&#32;&#80;&#32;&#60&#46;&#48;&#48;&#49;&#41;&#46;&#32;&#83;&#117;&#98;&#106;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#115;&#32;&#119;&#104;&#111;&#32;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#101;&#32;&#110;&#111;&#116;&#32;&#97;&#115;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#102;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#105;&#114;&#32;&#112;&#111;&#115;&#116;&#45;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#32;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#101;&#32;&#50;&#56;&#46;&#53;&#37;&#32;&#109;&#111;&#114;&#101;&#32;&#108;&#105;&#107;&#101;&#108;&#121;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#97;&#110;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#111;&#115;&#101;&#32;&#119;&#104;&#111;&#32;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#101;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#102;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#32;&#111;&#114;&#32;&#118;&#101;&#114;&#121;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#102;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#32;&#116;&#111;&#32;&#99;&#104;&#97;&#110;&#103;&#101;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#105;&#114;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#97;&#102;&#116;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#102;&#101;&#101;&#100;&#98;&#97;&#99;&#107;&#32;&#119;&#105;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#111;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#115;&#117;&#98;&#106;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#115;&#39;&#32;&#112;&#111;&#115;&#116;&#45;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#32;&#40;&#99;&#104;&#105;&#40;&#50;&#41;&#32;&#40;&#49;&#41;&#61;&#32;&#54;&#54;&#46;&#54;&#53;&#44;&#32;&#80;&#32;&#60&#46;&#48;&#48;&#49;&#41;&#46;&#32;&#67;&#79;&#78;&#67;&#76;&#85;&#83;&#73;&#79;&#78;&#83;&#58;&#32;&#83;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#32;&#97;&#99;&#114;&#111;&#115;&#115;&#32;&#113;&#117;&#97;&#108;&#105;&#116;&#121;&#32;&#104;&#101;&#97;&#108;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#102;&#111;&#114;&#109;&#97;&#116;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#32;&#115;&#111;&#117;&#114;&#99;&#101;&#115;&#32;&#111;&#110;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#32;&#87;&#101;&#98;&#32;&#99;&#97;&#110;&#32;&#105;&#109;&#112;&#114;&#111;&#118;&#101;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#117;&#109;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#39;&#32;&#97;&#99;&#99;&#117;&#114;&#97;&#99;&#121;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#32;&#104;&#101;&#97;&#108;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#113;&#117;&#101;&#115;&#116;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#46;&#32;&#72;&#111;&#119;&#101;&#118;&#101;&#114;&#44;&#32;&#97;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#117;&#109;&#101;&#114;&#39;&#115;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#102;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#110;&#99;&#101;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#105;&#115;&#32;&#110;&#111;&#116;&#32;&#97;&#32;&#103;&#111;&#111;&#100;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#100;&#105;&#99;&#97;&#116;&#111;&#114;&#32;&#111;&#102;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#98;&#101;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#114;&#114;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#46;&#32;&#67;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#117;&#109;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#32;&#119;&#104;&#111;&#32;&#97;&#114;&#101;&#32;&#110;&#111;&#116;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#102;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#105;&#114;&#32;&#97;&#110;&#115;&#119;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#32;&#97;&#102;&#116;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#115;&#101;&#97;&#114;&#99;&#104;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#32;&#97;&#114;&#101;&#32;&#109;&#111;&#114;&#101;&#32;&#108;&#105;&#107;&#101;&#108;&#121;&#32;&#116;&#111;&#32;&#98;&#101;&#32;&#105;&#110;&#102;&#108;&#117;&#101;&#110;&#99;&#101;&#100;&#32;&#116;&#111;&#32;&#99;&#104;&#97;&#110;&#103;&#101;&#32;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#105;&#114;&#32;&#118;&#105;&#101;&#119;&#115;&#32;&#119;&#104;&#101;&#110;&#32;&#112;&#114;&#111;&#118;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#100;&#32;&#119;&#105;&#116;&#104;&#32;&#102;&#101;&#101;&#100;&#98;&#97;&#99;&#107;&#32;&#102;&#114;&#111;&#109;&#32;&#111;&#116;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#32;&#99;&#111;&#110;&#115;&#117;&#109;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#46;<br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18244893?dopt=Abstract">PMID: 18244893</a></p>
<p><strong>David wonders:</strong> The fact that study participants were undergrad students is pretty significant, isn&#8217;t it?
<p>
_______________<br />
<strong>Feed-only Footer:</strong><br />
[This space for rent]  Want to reach about 3,500 RSS subscribers to this feed?  Please get in touch.<br />
<img src="http://services.nexodyne.com/email/icon/ohP3Htky8azEyIC0VA%3D%3D/gK76Zpo%3D/R01haWw%3D/0/image.png"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/27/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-2252007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MScanner: a classifier for retrieving Medline citations</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/26/mscanner-a-classifier-for-retrieving-medline-citations/</link>
		<comments>http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/26/mscanner-a-classifier-for-retrieving-medline-citations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3rd Party PubMed/MEDLINE Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Geekery in Recent Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/27/mscanner-a-classifier-for-retrieving-medline-citations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MScanner: a classifier for retrieving Medline citations
Graham L Poulter, Daniel L Rubin, Russ B Altman and Cathal Seoighe
BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:108doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-108
Published: 19 February 2008
Free full text: [PDF]
Article is about a third-party PubMed/MEDLINE tool that I have not been able to make work, MScanner.
[Other posts about third-party PubMed/MEDLINE tools]

_______________
Feed-only Footer:
[This space for rent]  Want to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/9/108">MScanner: a classifier for retrieving Medline citations</a><br />
Graham L Poulter, Daniel L Rubin, Russ B Altman and Cathal Seoighe<br />
BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:108doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-108<br />
Published: 19 February 2008</p>
<p>Free full text: [<a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2105-9-108.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Article is about a third-party PubMed/MEDLINE tool that I have not been able to make work, <a href="http://mscanner.stanford.edu">MScanner</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://davidrothman.net/category/technology/3rd-party-pubmedmedline-tools/">[Other posts about third-party PubMed/MEDLINE tools]</a>
<p>
_______________<br />
<strong>Feed-only Footer:</strong><br />
[This space for rent]  Want to reach about 3,500 RSS subscribers to this feed?  Please get in touch.<br />
<img src="http://services.nexodyne.com/email/icon/ohP3Htky8azEyIC0VA%3D%3D/gK76Zpo%3D/R01haWw%3D/0/image.png"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/26/mscanner-a-classifier-for-retrieving-medline-citations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Geekery in Recent Literature &#8211; 2/17/2008</title>
		<link>http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/17/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-2172008/</link>
		<comments>http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/17/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-2172008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Health Info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[For Medical Libraryfolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Geekery in Recent Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/17/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-2172008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More about online consumer cancer information
Cancer Invest. 2008 Mar;26(2):202-7.
Internet health resources and the cancer patient.
Huang GJ, Penson DF.
Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.
The last decade has witnessed an explosion of online information regarding cancer and healthcare. Accompanying this has been a large body of research [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More about online consumer cancer information</strong></p>
<p>Cancer Invest. 2008 Mar;26(2):202-7.<br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18259953?dopt=Abstract">Internet health resources and the cancer patient.</a><br />
Huang GJ, Penson DF.<br />
Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.<br />
The last decade has witnessed an explosion of online information regarding cancer and healthcare. Accompanying this has been a large body of research analyzing the quality of this information, how patients perceive these data and how this affects the doctor-patient relationship. This report reviews this literature, summarizing the current state of internet health resources available to the cancer patient and identifying areas for future research. Studies indicate that there are considerable internet resources available to cancer patients and that patients are using these resources as secondary information sources. Specifically, studies indicate that 16-64% of patients are using the internet to obtain health information. For the most part, patients perceive the online information to be reliable but maintain a healthy degree of skepticism. Studies objectively evaluating cancer information on the internet indicate that there is reasonable quality, although the language level of many sites is higher than that of the average American, which may limit the utility of the websites. Finally, while there is widespread internet use by physicians, healthcare providers are skeptical of their patients&#8217; ability to use the internet and may even be somewhat threatened by it. In summary, while there is a fairly large literature on internet resources available to the cancer patient, more research is needed. Specifically, it is important to better understand how patients access health information online and their associated preferences so that we can improve cancer patient&#8217;s access to high quality health information on the internet to facilitate decision-making and health outcomes.<br />
PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18259953?dopt=Abstract">18259953</a></p>
<p><strong>Webcasting for dentistry education!</strong></p>
<p>Br Dent J. 2008 Feb 9;204(3):145-9.<br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18264069?dopt=Abstract">Webcasting: casting the web more widely.</a><br />
Reynolds PA, Mason R, Eaton KA.<br />
Centre of Flexible Learning in Dentistry, King&#8217;s College London Dental Institute, Floor 3, Strand Bridge House, 138-142 Strand, London, UK. P.A.Reynolds@kcl.ac.uk<br />
In the search for a cost-effective method of delivering teaching to dispersed groups of students, webcasting is proving successful. By taking video streams and transmitting them over the Internet it allows events such as lectures, seminars, webinars and tuition sessions to be made accessible to participants in many different, remote locations. Moreover, the webcasts can be stored on a normal PC to give, those unable to see the original broadcast, the opportunity to watch it at a later, more convenient time; similarly it can be used by students for revision purposes. New developments have allowed a useful level of interactivity between presenters and students, and between students themselves. As part of a recent project at a UK dental school, webcasting was trialed amongst undergraduates and postgraduates to measure its value for dental education. The results have been very encouraging, with the latter group especially benefiting from being able to see the webcasts in their own time, on their PCs at home or work. However, as befits an ever-changing scenario, a new web-oriented facility is beginning to play a role in education: podcasting provides a more personal, individual interaction with the web.<br />
PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18264069?dopt=Abstract">18264069</a>
<p>
_______________<br />
<strong>Feed-only Footer:</strong><br />
[This space for rent]  Want to reach about 3,500 RSS subscribers to this feed?  Please get in touch.<br />
<img src="http://services.nexodyne.com/email/icon/ohP3Htky8azEyIC0VA%3D%3D/gK76Zpo%3D/R01haWw%3D/0/image.png"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidrothman.net/2008/02/17/web-geekery-in-recent-literature-2172008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

